The honest answer
This is a harder question here than anywhere else in New Zealand, and the reason is unusual: the free alternative is genuinely excellent. The Hooker Valley Track costs nothing, takes three hours and ends at a lake full of icebergs under the highest mountain in the country. So is it worth $497 for three hours, of which ninety minutes is walking? Here is the case both ways.
Quick answer
The short answer. Yes, if you have two nights and can book the first morning — because it is the only way to stand on a glacier here, and the free walk cannot substitute for that. No, if you have one day and a bus to catch: do the Hooker Valley Track instead and come back properly.
The case against
The free walk is very good. This is the strongest argument against and no other glacier destination in New Zealand has it. The Hooker Valley Track is ten kilometres of boardwalk and formed track to a lake with ice floating in it, under a 3,724-metre mountain, and it costs nothing. Plenty of people leave Aoraki having done only that and feeling completely satisfied.
It is expensive for the hours. Five hundred dollars, of which about ninety minutes is the thing you paid for. For a family of four it is a serious number in a park where the headline attraction is free.
The weather can take it. A heli hike needs a window long enough for the machine to drop you and come back, and this is high alpine country with one road in. You get your money back, but a refund is not what you came for.
The case for
You are not buying a better view of the glacier. You are buying the only way onto it.
Strip out the marketing and there are three things.
Access that does not otherwise exist. The Tasman ends in a lake that formed around 1990 and by 2008 was about seven kilometres long and two hundred and forty-five metres deep. There is no track around it and no route across it. This is not the premium way of standing on this glacier; it is the only way.
Ninety minutes rather than ten. A scenic flight lands on the snow and lets you out beside the machine. That is a photograph. Ninety minutes and two and a half kilometres is a place you were in, and the difference is not a matter of degree.
Things the air cannot show you. Crevasse walls with blue light in them, pressure ridges the height of a room, and in late summer the meltwater tunnels. All of them are ground-level features. No flight over this glacier contains one, at any price.
And one more, which is harder to price: the route was cut that morning by somebody with an axe, because the Tasman is moving and last week’s route has gone. Nobody has walked exactly where you walk.
Who should and should not book
Based on what people say afterwards rather than on what sells.
You have two mornings and the odds are firmly with you. Fly on the first, walk the Hooker Valley in the evening light, and keep the second morning as insurance. This is the case the whole site is built around.
Take the first departure and have the twenty-five minute flight reserved as well. Both are free to cancel and one of them will probably run.
The odds are against you and the disappointment is expensive. Do the free walk, look at the Tasman from the viewpoint, and come back properly another time.
Ninety minutes on uneven ice in crampons is the product. If that is doubtful, the flight lands you on snow for ten minutes and asks nothing of you.
On the ice your horizon is about forty metres away. If what you want is the Southern Alps as a range, forty-five minutes in the air gives you far more of it for less money.
The valley tracks have none and the Hooker Valley is genuinely family walking. Heli hikes set a minimum, and it varies by operator.
If you decide to fly, the next question is which of the three, and they are not identical.
Which heli hike to book→Book direct
Two glacier walks, a flight, and the guided version of the free track.
★ 4.9 · 322 reviews
★ 4.8 · 259 reviews
★ 4.7 · 514 reviews
★ 4.8 · 566 reviews
Common questions
Yes, if you have two nights at Aoraki and can book the first morning. It is the only way to stand on the longest glacier in New Zealand, and ninety minutes on the ice is a different thing from ten minutes beside a helicopter. On a single day with a bus to catch, walk the Hooker Valley instead.
They answer different questions. The free walk is arguably the more beautiful day and it is the one most people describe afterwards — but it stops at a lake, and it cannot put you on a glacier. Most people with two days here do both, and that is the right answer.
Per hour actually spent on the ice it is about four times cheaper. Whether the total is worth it depends on whether you want to be on the glacier or above it, which is genuinely the whole question.
Walk the Hooker Valley Track, because it is free, and put the money into the twenty-five minute flight at $210 if you want to be up there at all. That combination costs a fraction of the heli hike and covers most of the park.
Book it anyway, early in your stay. Cancellation is free and the refund is automatic, so an uncertain forecast costs you nothing — while a clear morning that arrives when you have no booking costs you the trip.
Two things, consistently: booking the flight for their last morning, and doing Aoraki as a day trip. Almost nobody regrets the money once they have been on the ice.
Go deeper
Six marked tracks from the village, with real DOC times and distances.
On the iceThe only walk on the longest glacier in New Zealand, and what the three hours contain.
The famous oneTen kilometres return, three swing bridges, a lake full of icebergs, and it is free.
The hard one2,200 steps and 600 metres of climb, and where the walking stops and mountaineering starts.
The free view300 steps to a viewpoint over a lake that did not exist in 1970.
PricesThree heli hikes priced against the flights and against the walks that cost nothing.
3-Hour Tasman Glacier Heli Hike
★ 4.9 · 646 reviews · Free cancellation 24 h